The concept of cooperation among Sout East Asean Nations
Before
making an analysis on the specific case of SAARC as a regional integration
process, we can highlight the connotation of region and regional integration
which is significant in this context. There is no denying the fact that on
collective research regions are used in shorter sense having encountered
external cooperation among regions in the field of trade, commerce, economics,
export and import. But regional integration may be used in broader sense as
because integration is needed in order to man-oeuvre the basic cooperation
system in relation to the relevant regions in which the respective fields of
regions are settled down virtually.
Regional
integration has become a very common way of co-operation among states in
present day international relations. Generally a ‘region’ is an area where some
geographically proximate states join together to achieve their common
objectives. As I mentioned earlier, in
the present time more or less every
nation-state, strong or weak, is a member of a regional system. But there are
some states which exist on the borderline between two regions. That is one of
the reasons for those states not joining
in any regional co-operation arrangements. Although geographical considerations
are an important factor for the formation of a region, other factors-for example, social, economic,
political, historical, and organizational - are also important. So we can say
that a region consists of two or more proximate states and interacting
states which have some common ethnic, linguistic, cultural, social, and/or
historical bonds, and whose sense of identity is sometimes increased by the
actions and attitudes towards those of states external to the region.
The
member states of SAARC are geographically proximate with each other. These
states have something in common. For example, they have some common social and
historical bonds. These states have common colonial past. Those states (for
example Nepal) who were not
under colonial rule have also been influenced by that rule owing to geographical proximity with India. There is some cultural
commonality among the SAARC states. But where the region ends-for example, on
the eastern side-Burma is neither a member of SAARC nor yet of ASEAN. On the
western side Afghanistan neither belongs to the Middle
East nor to the South Asian group. These states exist on the
borderline between two regional systems.
Comments
Post a Comment